Preview

Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS (Proceedings of ISP RAS)

Advanced search

The Method of Converting an Expert Opinion to Z-number

https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2016-28(3)-1

Abstract

The concept of Z-numbers introduced by Zade in 2011 is discussed topically nowadays due to it aptitude to deal with nonlinearities and uncertainties whose are common in real life. It was a large step of representing fuzzy logic, however that numbers created much larger problems of how to calculate them or aggregate multiple numbers of that type. Z-numbers have a significant potential in the describing of the uncertainty of the human knowledge because both the expert assessment and the Z-number consists of restraint and reliability of the measured value. In this paper, a method of converting an expert opinion to Z-number is proposed according to set of specific questions. In addition, the approach to Z-numbers aggregation is introduced. Finally, submitted methods are demonstrated on a real example. The topicality of the research is developing a new algorithm and software (based on that development) which could help people make decision in a messy uncertainty with many parameters and factors that are also defined imprecisely. In this work, we present the research that is aimed to find the most efficient methods to operate them (aggregate, add, divide). Firstly, it is important to identify all existing methods of aggregating Z-numbers. Secondly, it is needed to invent new methods of how work with them. The most interesting techniques should be detailed and summarized. There is also a program that is developed to model the real-word task of decision-making.

About the Authors

E. A. Glukhoded
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


S. I. Smetanin
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


References

1. Adrian K. Rantilla, David V. Budescu. Aggregation of Expert Opinions. In Systems Sciences, HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference, 1999.

2. Aliev, R. A., Alizadeh A. V. and Huseynov O. H. The arithmetic of discrete Z-numbers, Inform. Sciences, 290(1), 2015, pp.134-155.

3. Aliev, R.A., Alizadeh, A.V, Huseynov, O. H, Aliyev, R.R. The arithmetic of Z-numbers. Theory and Applications. World Scientific, 2015.

4. Aliev, R.A., Zeinalova, L. M. Decision-making under Z-information. In Human-centric decision-making models for social sciences, Springer-Verlag,, 2013, pp. 233-252.

5. Bai, Y., Wang, D. Fundamentals of Fuzzy Logic Control – Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Rules and Defuzzifications. In Advanced Fuzzy Logic Technologies in Industrial Applications, Springer, 2006 pp. 17-36.

6. Detyniecki, M. Fundamentals on Aggregation Operators. Berkeley initiative in Soft Computing, Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, United Sates of America, 2001.

7. Eiichiro Takahagi. Usage: Choauet integral. Fuzzy Integral Calculation Site (online publication). Available at: http://www.isc.senshu-u.ac.jp/~thc0456/Efuzzyweb/mant1/mant1.html, accessed 03.04.2016.

8. Farina, M., and Amato, P. A fuzzy definition of "optimality" for many criteria optimization problems. IEEE T. Syst. Man Cy. A: Systems and Humans, 34(3), 2004, pp. 315-326.

9. Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Additive Representations of Non-Additive Measures and the Choquet Integral. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Discussion Papers (online publication). Available at: https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math/papers/985.pdf, accessed 17.05.2016.

10. Gilboa, I. Theory of Decision under Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.

11. Kang B., Wei D., Li Y., Deng Y. Decision Making Using Z-numbers under Uncertain Environment. Journal of Information & Computational Science, №8(7), 2012, pp. 2807-2814.

12. Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., Deng, Y. A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number. Journal of Information & Computational Science, №9(3), 2012 pp. 703-709.

13. Lala M. Zeinalova, Choquet aggregation based decision making under Z-information. ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 4(4), 2014, pp. 819-824.

14. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 97. Tomasa Calvo, Gaspar Mayor, Radko Mesiar (eds). Aggregation Operators. New Trends and Aplications. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, 2002, 352 p.

15. Zadeh, L.A. A Note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences, №181, pp. 2923-2932.

16. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, vol. 8(3), pp. 338–353, 1965.

17. Gulnara Yakh'yaeva. [Fundamentals of the theory of fuzzy sets. Lecture 4. Indicator for fuzziness of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy measures and integrals] (online publication). Available at: http://www.intuit.ru/studies/courses/87/87/lecture/20505?page=3, accessed 15.05.2016 (in Russian).

18. Sakulin S.A., Alfimtsev A.N. On the issue of the practical application of fuzzy measures and Choquet integral. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University. Series Instrument Engineering, spec. issue 4: Computer Systems and Technologies, 2012, pp. 55-63 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Glukhoded E.A., Smetanin S.I. The Method of Converting an Expert Opinion to Z-number. Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS (Proceedings of ISP RAS). 2016;28(3):7-20. https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2016-28(3)-1



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-8156 (Print)
ISSN 2220-6426 (Online)