The effect of numerical dissipation on the predictive accuracy of wall-modelled large-eddy simulation

The effect of numerical dissipation on the predictive accuracy of wall-modelled large-eddy simulation is investigated via systematic simulations of fully-developed turbulent channel flow. A total of 16 simulations are conducted using the open-source computational fluid dynamics software OpenFOAM®. Four densities of the computational mesh are considered, with four simulations performed on each, in turn varying in the amount of numerical dissipation introduced by the numerical scheme used for interpolating the convective fluxes. The results are compared to publicly-available data from direct numerical simulation of the same flow. Computed error profiles of all the considered flow quantities are shown to vary monotonically with the amount of dissipation introduced by the numerical schemes. As expected, increased dissipation leads to damping of high-frequency motions, which is clearly observed in the computed energy spectra. But it also results in increased energy of the large-scale motions, and a significant over-prediction of the turbulent kinetic energy in the inner region of the boundary layer. On the other hand, dissipation benefits the accuracy of the mean velocity profile, which in turn improves the prediction of the wall shear stress given by the wall model. Thus, in the current framework, the optimal choice for the dissipation of the numerical schemes may depend on the primary quantity of interest for the conducted simulation. With respect to the resolution of the grid, the change in the accuracy is much less predictable, and the optimal resolution depends on the considered quantity and the amount of dissipation introduced by the numerical schemes.

1. H. Choi and P. Moin, “Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 24, p. 011702, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3676783

2. M. Liefvendahl and C. Fureby, “Grid requirements for LES of ship hydrodynamics in model and full scale,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 143, pp. 259–268, 2017. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.07.055

3. S. Rezaeiravesh and M. Liefvendahl, “Grid construction strategies for wall-resolving large eddy simulation and estimates of the resulting number of grid points,” 2017. Available: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1088656

4. U. Piomelli and E. Balaras, “Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 34, pp. 349–374, 2002. Available: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.34.082901.144919

5. U. Piomelli, “Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 437–446, 2008. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.06.001

6. J. Larsson, S. Kawai, J. Bodart, and I. Bermejo-Moreno, “Large eddy simulation with modeled wall-stress: recent progress and future directions,” Mechanical Engineering Reviews, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.1299/mer.15-00418

7. S. T. Bose and G. I. Park, “Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for complex turbulent flows,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 50, pp. 535–561, 2018. Available: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045241

8. M. Wang and P. Moin, “Dynamic wall modeling for large-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 14, p. 2043, 2002. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1476668

9. T.-H. Shih, L. A. Povinelli, N.-S. Liu, and K.-H. Chen, “Generalized wall function for complex turbulent flows,” Journal of Turbulence, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 37–41, 2003. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-5248/4/1/015

10. S. Kawai and K. Asada, “Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of high Reynolds number flow around an airfoil near stall condition,” Computers and Fluids, vol. 85, pp. 105–113, 2013. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.11.005

11. C. Duprat, G. Balarac, O. Métais, P. M. Congedo, and O. Brugière, “A wall-layer model for large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows with/out pressure gradient,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 23, p. 015101, 2011.

12. G. I. Park and P. Moin, “An improved dynamic non-equilibrium wall-model for large eddy simulation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 26, p. 015108, 2014. Available: http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4861069

13. W. Sidebottom, O. Cabrit, I. Marusic, C. Meneveau, A. Ooi, and D. Jones, “Modelling of wall shear-stress fluctuations for large-eddy simulation,” in 19th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, 2014, pp. 8–11.

14. G. I. Park, “Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of a high Reynolds number separating and reattaching flow,” AIAA Journal, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3709–3721, 2017. Available: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.J055745

15. W. H. Cabot and P. Moin, “Approximate wall boundary conditions in the large-eddy simulation of high Reynolds number flow,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 63, pp. 269–291, 1999. Available: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009958917113

16. S. Rezaeiravesh, T. Mukha, and M. Liefvendahl, “Systematic study of accuracy of wall-modeled large eddy simulation using uncertainty quantification techniques,” Computers and Fluids, vol. 185, pp. 34–58, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.03.025

17. P. Sagaut, Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows: An introduction. Springer-Verlag, 2005.

18. F. Nicoud and F. Ducros, “Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 183–200, 1999. Available: https://www.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995426001

19. H. Jasak, “Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows,” Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, 1996.

20. H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby, “A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques,” Computers in Physics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 620–631, 1998. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.168744

21. E. De Villiers, “The potential of large eddy simulation for the modeling of wall bounded flows,” Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, 2006.

22. T. Mukha, S. Rezaeiravesh, and M. Liefvendahl, “A library for wall-modelled large-eddy simulation based on OpenFOAM technology,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 239, pp. 204–224, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.016

23. S. Kawai and J. Larsson, “Wall-modeling in large eddy simulation: Length scales, grid resolution, and accuracy,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 015105, 2012. Available: http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.3678331

24. D. B. Spalding, “A single formula for the `law of the wall’,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 455–458, 1961. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3641728

25. M. Lee and R. D. Moser, “Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Re_\tau\approx5200,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 774, pp. 395–415, 2015. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.268