Сплоченность группы для системы коучинга в совместной среде
https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2022-34(3)-8
Аннотация
Технологии, поддерживающие совместную работу, должны не только предоставлять общее рабочее пространство, но и поддерживать коллаборацию. В ходе наблюдательного исследования были выявлены некоторые проблемы совместной работы в группах людей, работающих в системе с материальным пользовательским интерфейсом. Некоторые из этих проблем можно выявить и предотвратить при поддержке Coaching System. Эта система поощряет взаимодействие между членами группы посредством социальных вмешательств. Чтобы разработать систему коучинга, необходимо знать сплоченность членов группы, чтобы принять решение о соответствующих социальных вмешательствах. В данной работе предлагается модель для представления социальных взаимодействий, происходящих в группе людей при выполнении задачи. Взаимодействия можно анализировать, чтобы определить степень сплоченности группы и поддержать сотрудничество.
Об авторах
Алессандра РЕЙЕС-ФЛОРЕС
Факультет статистики и информатики Университета Веракрус
Мексика
Мексика
Профессор
Кармен МЕЗУРА-ГОДОЙ
Факультет статистики и информатики Университета Веракрус
Мексика
Мексика
Получила степень доктора компьютерных наук в Университете Савойи во Франции, профессор
Эдгар БЕНИТЕС-ГЕРРЕРО
Факультет статистики и информатики Университета Веракрус
Мексика
Мексика
Доктор компьютерных наук Гренобльского университета во Франции, профессор
Луис Херардо МОНТАНЕ-ХИМЕНЕС
Факультет статистики и информатики Университета Веракрус
Мексика
Мексика
Доктор компьютерных наук, профессор
Список литературы
1. Schuman Sandy, ed. Creating a culture of collaboration: The International Association of Facilitators handbook. John Wiley & Sons, 2006, 536 p.
2. Ellis C.A., Gibbs S.J., & Rein G. Groupware: some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, issue 1, 1991, pp. 39-58.
3. Olsson T., Jarusriboonchai P. et al. Technologies for enhancing co-located social interaction: review of design solutions and approaches. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 29, issue 1, 2020, pp. 29-83.
4. Van Leeuwen A., Janssen J. et al. Teacher interventions in a synchronous, co-located CSCL setting: Analyzing focus, means, and temporality. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, issue 4, 2013, pp. 1377-1386.
5. Martinez-Maldonado R., Kay J. et al. Co-located collaboration analytics: Principles and dilemmas for mining multimodal interaction data. Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 34, issue 1, 2019, pp. 1-50.
6. Jermann P., Soller A., & Muehlenbrock M. From mirroring to guiding: A review of the state of art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 15, issue 4, 2005, pp 261-290.
7. Constantino-Gonzales M.A., & Suthers D.D. Coaching Collaboration by Comparing Solutions and Tracking Participation. In Proc. of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2001, pp. 173-180.
8. Shaer O., & Hornecker E. Tangible user interfaces: past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 3, no. 1-2, 2010, pp 4-137.
9. Schneider B., Blikstein P., and Mackay W. Combinatorix: a tangible user interface that supports collaborative learning of probabilities. In Proc. of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, 2012, pp. 129-132.
10. Foad H., Baljko M. et al. Synchrum: a tangible interface for rhythmic collaboration. In Adjunct Proc. of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2012, pp. 63-64.
11. Sylla C. Designing a tangible interface for collaborative storytelling to access 'embodiment' and meaning making. In Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 2013, pp. 651-654.
12. Antle A.N., Wise A.F. et al. Youtopia: a collaborative, tangible, multi-touch, sustainability learning activity. In Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 2013, pp. 655-658.
13. Leversund A.H., Krzywinski A., and Chen W. Children’s collaborative storytelling on a tangible multitouch tabletop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8530, 2014, pp. 142-153.
14. Waje A., Tearo K. et al. Grab this, swipe that: Combining tangible and gestural interaction in multiple display collaborative gameplay. In Proc. of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. 2016, pp. 433-438.
15. Baranauskas M.C.C., and Gutiérrez Posada J.E. Tangible and shared storytelling: Searching for the social dimension of constructionism. In Proc. of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 2017, pp. 193-203.
16. Wallbaum T., Ananthanarayan S. et al. Towards a tangible storytelling kit for exploring emotions with children. In Proc. of the on Thematic Workshops of ACM Multimedia 2017, pp. 10-16.
17. Melcer E.F. and Isbister K. Bots & (Main) frames: exploring the impact of tangible blocks and collaborative play in an educational programming game. In Proc. of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2018, pp. 1-14.
18. Nacenta M.A., Pinelle D. et al. Individual and group support in tabletop interaction techniques. In Tabletops – Horizontal Interactive Displays. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London, 2010, pp. 303-333.
19. Doeweling S., Tahiri T. et al. Support for collaborative situation analysis and planning in crisis management teams using interactive tabletops. In Proc. of the 2013 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, 2013, pp. 273-282.
20. Wise A.F., Antle A.N. et al. What kind of world do you want to live in? Positive interdependence and collaborative processes in the tangible tabletop land-use planning game Youtopia. In Proc. of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL 2015), 2015, pp. 236-243.
21. Xambó A., Hornecker E. et al. Let's jam the reactable: Peer learning during musical improvisation with a tabletop tangible interface. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 20, issue 6, 2013, article no. 36, pp. 1-34.
22. Cherek C., Brocker A. et al. Tangible Awareness: How Tangibles on Tabletops Influence Awareness of Each Other's Actions. In Proc. of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2018, paper no. 298, pp. 1-7.
23. Huber S., Berner R. et al. Tangible objects for reminiscing in dementia care. In Proc. of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 2019, pp. 15-24.
24. Koushik V., Guinness D., and Kane S.K. Storyblocks: A tangible programming game to create accessible audio stories. In Proc. of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2019, paper no. 492, pp. 1-12.
25. Morris M.R., Cassanego A. et al. Mediating group dynamics through tabletop interface design. IEEE computer graphics and applications, vol. 26, issue 5, 2006, pp. 65-73.
26. Ter Beek M.H., Massink M. et al. A case study on the automated verification of groupware protocols. In Proc. of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005, pp. 596-603.
27. Kim T., Chang A. et al. Meeting mediator: enhancing group collaboration using sociometric feedback. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2008, pp. 3183-3188.
28. Cepero T., Montané-Jiménez L.G., and Toledo-Toledo G. Visualization Technologies to Support Decision-Making in City Management. Programming and Computer Software, vol. 47, issue 8, 2021, pp. 803-816.
29. Praharaj S., Scheffel M. et al. Group Coach for Co-located Collaboration. European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11722, 2019, pp. 732-736.
30. Soller A., Martínez A. et al. From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 15, issue 4, 2005, pp. 261-290.
31. Paredes Rendón P. A. PaperTUI: Sistema tangible para el prototipado de interfaces gráficas de usuario. Doctoral dissertation. Universidad Veracruzana. Facultad de Estadística e Informática, 2020, 225 p. (in Spanish).
32. Stangor C. Social groups in action and interaction. Routledge, 2015, 454 p.
33. Fjermestad J., Hiltz S.R. Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 17, issue 3, 2000, pp. 115-159.
34. Carron A.V. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, vol. 4, issue 2, 1982, pp. 123-138.
35. Yoo Y., and Alavi M. Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, 2001, pp. 371-390.
36. Rosas P. and Cristina C. Indicadores de cohesión grupal a considerar para su diagnóstico: estudio de un caso. Acta Odontológica Venezolana, vol. 59, no. 2, 2021, pp. 4-9 (in Spanish).
37. Bautista E., Casas E. et al. Utilidad del sociograma como herramienta para el análisis de las interacciones grupales. Psicologia para América Latina, no. 18, 2009, 6 p. (in Spanish).
38. Crespo P.T. and Antunes C. Predicting teamwork results from social network analysis. Expert Systems, vol. 32, issue 2, 2015, pp. 312-325.
39. Mezura-Godoy C., Riveill M., and Talbot S. Mars: Modelling arenas to regulate collaborative spaces. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2806, 2003, pp. 10-25.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
РЕЙЕС-ФЛОРЕС А., МЕЗУРА-ГОДОЙ К., БЕНИТЕС-ГЕРРЕРО Э., МОНТАНЕ-ХИМЕНЕС Л. Сплоченность группы для системы коучинга в совместной среде. Труды Института системного программирования РАН. 2022;34(3):111-126. https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2022-34(3)-8
For citation:
REYES-FLORES A., MEZURA-GODOY C., BENÍTEZ-GUERRERO E., MONTANÉ-JIMÉNEZ L. Group Cohesion for a Coaching System in Co-located Collaborative Environments. Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS (Proceedings of ISP RAS). 2022;34(3):111-126. https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2022-34(3)-8
Послать статью по эл. почте 