Methods for determining the elements of the PQRST-complex of the electrocardiogram
https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2022-34(4)-16
Abstract
An electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most common medical examinations. High-quality interpretation of a 12-channel electrocardiogram is important for subsequent diagnosis and treatment. One of the important steps in deciphering an ECG is to determine the boundaries of the elements of the PQRST complex. The article discusses mathematical methods for determining the boundaries of the P, T waves and the QRS complex, as well as the R, P and T peaks, presents the shortcomings of mathematical methods for determining the elements of the PQRST complex. And also the values of the metrics obtained as a result of training the neural network segmentation model of the PQRST-complex are given. The experiments performed show the relevance of using neural network and combined approaches to the analysis of the PQRST complex.
About the Authors
Olga Anatolyevna MASHKOVARussian Federation
Master's student of the Mechanics and Mathematics
Vsevolod Vladislavovich SHAKLEIN
Russian Federation
Undergraduate student
Yury Vitalievich MARKIN
Russian Federation
PhD in Technical Sciences, Researcher at ISP RAS
Evgeny Andreevich KARPULEVICH
Russian Federation
Specialist of the Information Systems Department
Vladislav Valerievich ANANEV
Russian Federation
Graduate and assistant of the Department of Information Technologies and Systems, Novgorod State University, postgraduate student of ISP RAS
Ariana Armenovna ASATRYAN
Armenia
Researcher
Shagane Tigranovna TIGRANYAN
Armenia
Graduate student
Sergej Nikolaevich SKORIK
Russian Federation
Master's student at MIPT and an employee of the ISP RAS
Denis Yuryevich TURDAKOV
Russian Federation
PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Head of the Information Systems Department at ISP RAS, Associate Professor of the System Programming Department of Moscow State University
References
1. Alexandridi A., Panagopoulos I. et al. R-Peak Detection with Alternative Haar Wavelet Filter. In Proc. of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, 2003, pp. 219-222.
2. Bank D., Koenigstein N., Giryes R. Autoencoders. arXiv:2003.05991, 2020, 22 p.
3. Coast D.A., Stern R.M. et al. An Approach to Cardiac Arrhythmia Analysis Using Hidden Markov Models. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, issue 9, 1990, pp. 826-836.
4. Di Marco L.Y., and Chiari L. A Wavelet-Based Ecg Delineation Algorithm for 32-Bit Integer Online Processing. Biomedical Engineering Online, vol. 10, issue 1, 2011, pp. 1-19
5. Fernández-Delgado M., Barro Ameneiro S. MART: A Multichannel Art-Based Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 9, issue 1, 1998, pp. 139-150.
6. Fraden J., Neuman M.R. QRS Wave Detection. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 18, issue 2, 1980. Pp. 125-132.
7. Kalyakulina A.I., Yusipov I.I. et al. Finding Morphology Points of Electrocardiographic Signal Waves Using Wavelet Analysis. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics, vol. 61, issue 8-9, 2019, pp. 689-703.
8. Kalyakulina A.I., Yusipov I.I. et al. Ludb: A New Open-Access Validation Tool for Electrocardiogram Delineation Algorithms. IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 186181-186190.
9. Kalyakulina A.I., Yusipov I.I. et al. Lobachevsky University Electrocardiography Database (Version 1.0. 0). PhysioNet, 2020, URL: https://physionet.org/content/ludb/1.0.0/.
10. Kalyakulina A.I., Yusipov I.I. et al. Lobachevsky University Electrocardiography Database (Version 1.0. 1). PhysioNet, 2021, URL: https://physionet.org/content/ludb/1.0.1/.
11. Mallat S. A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 11, issue 7, 1989, pp. 674-693.
12. Mallat S. Zero-Crossings of a Wavelet Transform. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 37 (4): 1991. “1019–33.
13. Martı́nez J.P., Almeida R. et al. A Wavelet-Based ECG Delineator: Evaluation on Standard Databases. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, issue 4, 2004, pp. 570-581.
14. Moskalenko V., Zolotykh N., Osipov G. Deep Learning for ECG Segmentation. In International Conference on Neuroinformatics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 856, 2019, pp. 246-254.
15. Redmon J., Divvala S. et al. You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. In Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 779-788.
16. Ronneberger O., Fischer P., Brox T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9351, 2015, pp. 234-241.
17. Sereda I., Alekseev S. et al. ECG Segmentation by Neural Networks: Errors and Correction. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2019, pp. 1-7.
18. Venkatesh S., Moffat D., and Reck Miranda E. You Only Hear Once: A YOLO-like Algorithm for Audio Segmentation and Sound Event Detection. Applied Sciences, vol. 12, issue 7, 2021, article no. 3293, 16 p.
Review
For citations:
MASHKOVA O.A., SHAKLEIN V.V., MARKIN Yu.V., KARPULEVICH E.A., ANANEV V.V., ASATRYAN A.A., TIGRANYAN Sh.T., SKORIK S.N., TURDAKOV D.Yu. Methods for determining the elements of the PQRST-complex of the electrocardiogram. Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS (Proceedings of ISP RAS). 2022;34(4):229-240. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2022-34(4)-16