Project Management Maturity Models: а Systematic Review
https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2024-36(6)-5
Abstract
Project management is a field that has been applied in various areas of knowledge, particularly in engineering and software development. For organizations, projects are a central element for generating value. They allow to reach the organizational goal by using specific methodologies, tools and software. One of the most recognized tools, even in other fields of knowledge, for its impact on process improvement is maturity models. These models have already begun to be implemented in project management. Project Management Maturity Models are useful tools to evaluate the management process using a process reference (e.g., PMBOK). This process reference describes the best practices to achieve success in projects. The purpose of this paper is the identification of research papers that present maturity models specifically for project management. A useful classification for project managers using maturity models in a project management context is generated from the results of the review.
About the Authors
Jorge Francisco RUIZ-LOPEZMexico
Doctoral student in Computer Science at the Computer Science Department of the National Center of Research and Technological Development in Mexico.
Javier ORTIZ-HERNANDEZ
Mexico
PhD in Automation and Computer Science, full professor at the Computer Science Department of the National Center of Research and Technological Development in Mexico. Research interests: digital transformation, requirements engineering, and business process modeling.
Eric BONJOUR
France
PhD in Automation and Industrial Engineering, full Professor specialized in systems engineering at the National Graduate School of Innovation and Systems Engineering (ENSGSI, Université de Lorraine). Research interests: model-based systems engineering, acceptability of innovative solutions, digital transformation, knowledge and skills management.
Jean-Pierre MICAELLI
France
PhD in Industrial Economics, Lumière University, Lyon, Master in Industrial Economics Jean Moulin University, Lyon, Senior Lecturer in Industrial and Operations Management at IAE School of Management of Lyon (Jean Moulin University), Research interests: development of performance evaluation methods and tools for the architecture of complex technical systems.
Yasmín HERNÁNDEZ
Mexico
PhD in Computer Science, full professor at the Computer Science Department of the National Center of Research and Technological Development in Mexico. Research interests: intelligent tutoring systems, human-computer interaction, educational data mining, affective computing, machine learning.
References
1. L. Torres, “A contingency view on the effect of project management maturity on perceived performance,” Ph.D Dissertation, Business School SKEMA, Lile, 2014.
2. J. Garzás, C. M. Fernández, and M. Piattini, “Una aplicación de la norma ISO/IEC 15504 para la evaluación por niveles de madurez de Pymes y pequeños equipos de desarrollo”, Revista Española de Innovación, Calidad e Ingeniería del Software, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 88-98, Jul. 2009.
3. Felipe Sánchez-Garzón, “Supporting the transformation of a company’s project management by elaborating an invariant-based project management maturity model and a causal predictive model between maturity criteria and project performance”, P.H.D Dissertation, Lorraine Université, Nancy, 2019.
4. B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, “Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering”, 2007.
5. A. González, A. Sandoval, and B. Heredia, “Elaboración de planes de entrenamiento cruzado a personal clave en proyectos: el caso de una empresa de ingeniería”, Revista ingeniería de construcción, vol. 33, no. 3, Dec. 2018, doi:10.4067/S0718-50732018000300205.
6. Á. Cuadros López, J. A. Morales Viveros, and A.B. Rojas Melendez, “Propuesta metodológica para medir el nivel de madurez de la gestión de proyectos en empresas de ingeniería”, Revista EIA, vol. 14, no. 27, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.24050/reia.v14i27.808.
7. E. Pérez-Mergarejo, I. Pérez-Vergara, and Y. Rodríguez-Ruíz, “Modelos de madurez y su idoneidad para aplicar en pequeñas y medianas empresas”, Ingeniería Industrial, vol. XXXV, no. 2, pp. 146–158, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36043 3597004.
8. F. F. Espinosa and G. E. Salinas, “Evaluación de la Madurez de la Función Mantenimiento para Implementar Innovaciones en su Gestión”, Información tecnológica, vol. 21, no. 3, 2010, doi: 10.4067/S0718-07642010000300002.
9. M. V. Jacquez-Hernández and V. G. López Torre, “Modelos de evaluación de la madurez y preparación hacia la Industria 4.0: una revisión de literatura”, Ingeniería Industrial. Actualidad y Nuevas Tendencias, vol. VI, no. 20, pp. 61– 78, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21505 7003004.
10. Prado Palacio and Leidy Johanna, “Grado de madurez en gestión de proyectos de una empresa constructora de vivienda en Santiago de Cali: caso de Buenavista constructora y promotora S.A.S”, Revista Espacios, vol. 40, no. 43, pp. 20–33, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://bibliotecadigital.univalle.edu.co/handle/ 10893/15226
11. Ó. Rubiano Ovalle and A. Cuadros Lopez, “Estado de la Gerencia De Proyectos En Pymes Del Sector Artes Gráficas y Propuestas de Lineamientos para su Mejoramiento”, (State of Project Management in SMEs of the Printing Sector and Proposed Guidelines for Improvement), 2012.
12. J. Shan and R. Lu, “Research on Application of Project Management Maturity Model in Risk Management of Electrical Engineering”, E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 218, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202021802040.
13. D. Yao, R. Zhou, and T. Fan, “Research on maturity of engineering project informatization management—As an example of Anhui Sanjian Engineering Co., LTD”, IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 267, p. 042144, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/267/4/042144.
14. R. Morlhon, R. Pellerin, and M. Bourgault,“Building Information Modeling Implementation through Maturity Evaluation and Critical Success Factors Management”, Procedia Technology, vol. 16, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.127.
15. T.-C. Lin and K. J. Wang, “Project-based maturity assessment model for smart transformation in Taiwanese enterprises”, PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254522.
16. F. Sanchez, E. Bonjour, J.-P. Micaelli, and D. Monticolo, “An Approach Based on Bayesian Network for Improving Project Management Maturity: An Application to Reduce Cost Overrun Risks in Engineering Projects”, Comput Ind, vol. 119, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103227.
17. F. Backlund, D. Chronéer, and E. Sundqvist, “Project Management Maturity Models – A Critical Review”, Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 119, pp. 837–846, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.094.
18. H. Tahri and O. Drissi-Kaitouni, “New Design for Calculating Project Management Maturity (PMM)”, Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 181, pp. 171–177, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.878.
19. A. J. Christoph and S. Konrad, “Project Complexity as an Influence Factor on the Balance of Costs and Benefits in Project Management Maturity Modeling”, Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 119, pp. 162–171, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.020.
20. A. Miklosik, “Improving Project Management Performance through Capability Maturity Measurement”, Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 30, pp. 522–530, 2015, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01264-2.
21. Y. H. Kwak and C. W. Ibbs, “Project Management Process Maturity (PM)2 Model”, Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 150–155, Jul. 2002, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X (2002)18:3(150).
22. A.-L. Mesquida and A. Mas, “A project management improvement program according to ISO/IEC 29110 and PMBOK®”, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 846–854, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1002/smr.1665.
23. M. Gershon, “Choosing Which Process Improvement Methodology to Implement”, The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 61, 2010.
24. Robert K. Wysocki, Project Management Process Improvement. Norwood: ARTECH HOUSE, INC, 2004.
25. H. K. Mittermaier and H. Steyn, “Project management maturity: An assessment of maturity for developing pilot plants”, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 95–107, 2009.
26. T. F. de Souza and C. F. S. Gomes, “Assessment of Maturity in Project Management: A Bibliometric Study of Main Models”, Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 55, pp. 92–101,2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07. 012.
27. J. C. Viana and C. M. de M. Mota, “Enhancing Organizational Project Management Maturity: a framework based on the value focused thinking model”, Production, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 313–329, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1590/0103- 6513.1699 13.
28. S. Nikkhou, K. Taghizadeh, and S. Hajiyakhchali, “Designing a Portfolio Management Maturity Model (Elena)”, Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 226, pp. 318–325, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016. 06.194.
29. N. Williams, N. P. Ferdinand, and R. Croft, “Project management maturity in the age of big data”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 311–317, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.11 08/IJMPB-01-2014-0001.
30. F. Y. Hernández, R. I. Laguado, and J. P. Rodriguez, “Maturity analysis in project management in Colombian universities”, J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1126, p. 012055, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012 055.
31. D. Seelhofer and C. O. Graf, “National project management maturity: A conceptual framework”, Central European Business Review, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 1, 2018.
32. L. De Souza Scotelano, R. Dalvo Pereira da Conceição, U. Da Costa Leonídio, and C. Silva de Jesus, “Project management maturity model: the case in an automotive industry in Brazil”, Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 500–507, Dec.2017, doi: 10.14488/BJOPM.2017.v14. n4.a6.
33. K. Jana and T. Libena, “Proposal and Verification of Project Management Methods and Tools Oriented Maturity Model”, Journal of Management and Projects, vol. 9, no. 1, 2018.
34. R. Silva, N. Duarte, T. Barros, and G. Fernandes, “Project Management Maturity: Case study analysis using OPM3® model in manufacturing industry”, in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, Jun. 2019, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ICE.2019.8792586.
35. I. Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 7th ed. Newton Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc., 2021.
36. E. Fabbro and S. Tonchia, “Project Management Maturity Models: Literature Review and New Developments”, The Journal of Modern Project Management, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 34–45, May 2022.
Review
For citations:
RUIZ-LOPEZ J., ORTIZ-HERNANDEZ J., BONJOUR E., MICAELLI J., HERNÁNDEZ Ya. Project Management Maturity Models: а Systematic Review. Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS (Proceedings of ISP RAS). 2024;36(6):83-102. https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2024-36(6)-5